{"id":2272,"date":"2024-12-06T13:32:25","date_gmt":"2024-12-06T13:32:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/?p=2272"},"modified":"2024-12-06T13:32:25","modified_gmt":"2024-12-06T13:32:25","slug":"dyshime-per-ligjshmerine-dhe-konflikte-interesi-ne-tenderin-100-mije-euro-te-nh-iber-lepenc-qe-drejtohet-nga-faruk-mujka","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/2024\/12\/06\/dyshime-per-ligjshmerine-dhe-konflikte-interesi-ne-tenderin-100-mije-euro-te-nh-iber-lepenc-qe-drejtohet-nga-faruk-mujka\/","title":{"rendered":"Dyshime p\u00ebr ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb dhe konflikte interesi n\u00eb tenderin 100 mij\u00eb euro t\u00eb NH \u201cIb\u00ebr Lepenc\u201d, q\u00eb drejtohet nga Faruk Mujka"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Nj\u00eb tender i shpallur nga Nd\u00ebrmarrja Publike Qendore \u201cIber Lepenc\u201d n\u00eb vler\u00eb prej 100 mij\u00eb euro p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin e aseteve publike ka hedhur dyshime t\u00eb forta mbi procedurat e ndjekura dhe ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb ofertave. Ankesa e nj\u00eb grupi operator\u00ebsh ekonomik\u00eb t\u00eb eliminuar nga gara ka zbuluar nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb parregullsish q\u00eb prekin jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebrmbushjen e kritereve teknike e profesionale, por edhe \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb ndjeshme si konflikti i interesit dhe manipulimi me dokumente, shkruan Demokracia.com.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lidhur me tenderin \u201cRivler\u00ebsimi i Aseteve n\u00eb Nd\u00ebrmarrjen Publike NH \u201cIber Lepenc\u201d Sh.A\u201d p\u00ebr kontrat\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb rekomanduar oferta m\u00eb e shtrenjt\u00eb p\u00ebr rreth 14 mij\u00eb euro e Grupit t\u00eb Operator\u00ebve Ekonomik\u00eb \u201cPro Ace Group SH.P.K.; H &amp; N SH.P.K.; NIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K.\u201d, me vler\u00eb 89,900.00 euro. Nd\u00ebrsa, \u00ebsht\u00eb eliminuar si ofert\u00eb e pap\u00ebrshtatshme ajo e Grupit t\u00eb Operator\u00ebve Ekonomik\u00eb \u201cProAudit SH.P.K.; LEGAL SOLUTION COMPANY SH.P.K.\u201d, me arsyetimin se nuk plot\u00ebsonte kushtet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/dheniaa.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-848989\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Menj\u00ebher\u00eb kompanit\u00eb e eliminuara kan\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr rishqyrtim tek Autoriteti Kontraktues (AK) -NH \u201cIber Lepenc\u201d Sh.A., duke pretenduar dhe qart\u00ebsuar se grupi i kompanive i shpallur fitues \u00ebsht\u00eb i pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr dh\u00ebnien e kontrat\u00ebs. K\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebrmbante gjasht\u00eb pika ankimore, ku theksohej se pjesa d\u00ebrrmuese e stafit profesional t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar sipas dosjes s\u00eb tenderit nuk p\u00ebrmbushte k\u00ebrkesat minimale t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb pozicionin kryesor \u201cudh\u00ebheq\u00ebs \u2013 menaxher i caktuar i projektit\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autoriteti Kontraktues hodhi posht\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha pretendimet e tyre. Pas k\u00ebtij refuzimi, kompania iu drejtua Organit Shqyrtues t\u00eb Prokurimit (OSHP) me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat pika ankimore. Si rrall\u00ebher\u00eb, kompania ankimuese ngarkoi dokumentet e ofert\u00ebs s\u00eb operator\u00ebve ekonomik\u00eb fitues, duke pretenduar se ato nuk p\u00ebrmbushnin kriteret q\u00eb vet\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarrja kishte vendosur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Demokracia.com<\/strong>&nbsp;bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebto dokumente dhe k\u00ebrkesat e vendosura nga \u201cIber Lepenci\u201d, verifikoi k\u00ebto pretendime dhe si\u00e7 shihet nga to, oferta e shpallur fituese \u00ebsht\u00eb e pap\u00ebrgjegjshme. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, dokumentet tregojn\u00eb se kompanit\u00eb fituese kishin p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb list\u00ebn e stafit profesional edhe persona q\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb pun\u00ebsuar si zyrtar\u00eb publik\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb zyrtar\u00eb t\u00eb prokurimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pra, nj\u00eb nga pikat m\u00eb t\u00eb forta ankimore ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me p\u00ebrfshirjen e Izahir Kuka, zyrtar i lart\u00eb i prokurimit n\u00eb Komun\u00ebn e Ka\u00e7anikut n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb komuna q\u00eb nga viti 2004, n\u00eb list\u00ebn e stafit profesional t\u00eb ofert\u00ebs fituese. Sipas dokumenteve t\u00eb ngarkuara n\u00eb Organin Shqyrtues t\u00eb Prokurimit (OSHP), z. Kuka m\u00eb her\u00ebt ka n\u00ebnshkruar nj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb pune me kompanin\u00eb NIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K., e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb pjes\u00eb e grupit fitues, p\u00ebr realizimin e projektit n\u00eb rast se tenderi i shpallet k\u00ebtij grupi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, Kuka ka n\u00ebnshkruar m\u00eb par\u00eb nj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb tjet\u00ebr me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn kompani p\u00ebr nj\u00eb projekt n\u00eb Komun\u00ebn e Ka\u00e7anikut, duke ngritur dyshime t\u00eb forta p\u00ebr konflikt interesi. Formulari i deklarimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb tij p\u00ebr vitin 2024 tregon se ai ka deklaruar t\u00eb ardhurat e tij vet\u00ebm si zyrtar publik, duke mos p\u00ebrmendur ndonj\u00eb angazhim tjet\u00ebr profesional. Kjo ngre dyshime serioze mbi besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e referencave t\u00eb dor\u00ebzuara dhe p\u00ebrputhshm\u00ebrin\u00eb me Ligjin p\u00ebr Prokurimin Publik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr pik\u00eb e fort\u00eb ankimore lidhet me mang\u00ebsit\u00eb n\u00eb referencat e stafit t\u00eb propozuar nga grupi fitues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Projektmenaxheri Hysen Ramabaja, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur si auditor ligjor, nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar d\u00ebshmi p\u00ebr realizimin e nj\u00eb projekti t\u00eb ngjash\u00ebm me at\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb dosjen e tenderit. Referenca e tij \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar nga vet\u00eb kompania q\u00eb ai drejton, duke e b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb pavlefshme sipas rregullave t\u00eb prokurimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Izahir Kuka, si\u00e7 p\u00ebrmendet m\u00eb lart, nuk p\u00ebrmbush k\u00ebrkesat p\u00ebr p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn trevje\u00e7are t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e hidros.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ardian Morina, i caktuar p\u00ebr teknologjin\u00eb informative, ka dor\u00ebzuar referenca q\u00eb nuk mbulojn\u00eb periudh\u00ebn trevje\u00e7are t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar dhe q\u00eb jan\u00eb l\u00ebshuar para p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb angazhimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nj\u00eb detaj tjet\u00ebr i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm \u00ebsht\u00eb prezantimi i dy polisave t\u00eb ndryshme t\u00eb sigurimit nga grupi fitues. Polisa e par\u00eb p\u00ebrfshinte vet\u00ebm dy operator\u00eb ekonomik\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa e dyta e dor\u00ebzuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb dat\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebvonshme, p\u00ebrfshinte nj\u00eb operator t\u00eb tret\u00eb. Ky veprim ka ngritur dyshime mbi seriozitetin e ofert\u00ebs dhe integritetin e procedurave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">P\u00ebrve\u00e7 konfliktit t\u00eb interesit dhe problemeve me stafin, ankuesit kan\u00eb ngritur pretendime p\u00ebr shkelje t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejta t\u00eb Ligjit p\u00ebr Prokurimin Publik. Sipas tyre, komisioni vler\u00ebsues nuk ka respektuar kriteret p\u00ebr vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e ofertave dhe ka anashkaluar parimet e barazis\u00eb n\u00eb trajtim dhe transparenc\u00ebs. P\u00ebr shembull, oferta e shpallur fituese kishte vlefshm\u00ebri p\u00ebr 60 dit\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa k\u00ebrkesa e tenderit ishte p\u00ebr 90 dit\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pikat ankimore<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">N\u00eb Flet\u00ebn e t\u00eb Dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb njoftimit p\u00ebr kontrat\u00eb, tek \u201cK\u00ebrkesat mbi mund\u00ebsit\u00eb teknike dhe\/ose profesionale\u201d (pikat 9.1 dhe 9.2), kriteri i p\u00ebrzgjedhjes \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar si vijon:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cNj\u00eb (1) udh\u00ebheq\u00ebs \u2013 menaxher i caktuar i projektit, p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs p\u00ebr koordinimin e aktiviteteve dhe sigurimin e p\u00ebrfundimit n\u00eb koh\u00eb. Udh\u00ebheq\u00ebsi i projektit duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb auditor ligjor dhe t\u00eb ket\u00eb s\u00eb paku 5 vite p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb pune n\u00eb auditim.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, i nj\u00ebjti kriter tek \u201cP\u00ebrb\u00ebrja e grupit\u201d n\u00eb specifikimet teknike \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar ndryshe:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u201cNj\u00eb (1) udh\u00ebheq\u00ebs \u2013 menaxher i caktuar i projektit, p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs p\u00ebr koordinimin e aktiviteteve dhe sigurimin e p\u00ebrfundimit n\u00eb koh\u00eb. Udh\u00ebheq\u00ebsi i projektit duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb auditor ligjor, t\u00eb ket\u00eb s\u00eb paku 5 vite p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb pune n\u00eb auditim, si dhe t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj\u00eb me referenca se ka kryer s\u00eb paku nj\u00eb projekt n\u00eb rivler\u00ebsimin e aseteve\u201d.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Moskoherenca dhe paqart\u00ebsia n\u00eb p\u00ebrshkrimin e k\u00ebtij kriteri t\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhjes bien n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me k\u00ebrkesat e Ligjit p\u00ebr Prokurimin Publik (LPP) dhe legjislacionin sekondar, duke ndikuar n\u00eb kufizim t\u00eb paarsyesh\u00ebm t\u00eb konkurrenc\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nga ana tjet\u00ebr,&nbsp;<strong>Demokracia.com<\/strong>&nbsp;ka gjetur se ky kriter ka qen\u00eb i kund\u00ebrligjsh\u00ebm, por operator\u00ebt ekonomik\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb ankuar n\u00eb faz\u00ebn e sqarimeve shtes\u00eb. Kjo sepse, sipas praktik\u00ebs, k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim ekspert gjyq\u00ebsor nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e domosdoshme dhe rrall\u00ebher\u00eb k\u00ebrkohet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb faz\u00eb, pasi ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb hap i rezervuar p\u00ebr gjykatat dhe jo p\u00ebr procesin e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb ofertave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/ekspert-gjyqsor.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-848993\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nj\u00eb pik\u00eb tjet\u00ebr ankimore e ngritur dhe e mb\u00ebshtetur me dokumente nga kompania ankimuese thekson se Hysen Ramabaja, i caktuar si projektmenaxher, \u00ebsht\u00eb auditor ligjor. Megjithat\u00eb, ai nuk ka ofruar d\u00ebshmi\/reference se ka realizuar s\u00eb paku nj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin e aseteve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">P\u00ebrve\u00e7 k\u00ebsaj, referenca e dat\u00ebs 20.06.2024, e l\u00ebshuar nga OE \u201cH&amp;N SH.P.K.\u201d p\u00ebr Ramabaj\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar n\u00eb dosjen e tenderit, por nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb d\u00ebshmi t\u00eb bindshme dhe konfirmuese p\u00ebr p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e tij n\u00eb auditim. Kjo pasi referenca \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar nga vet\u00eb subjekti juridik OE \u201cH&amp;N SH.P.K.\u201d dhe nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e n\u00ebnshkruar nga pal\u00eb t\u00eb treta q\u00eb mund t\u00eb konfirmojn\u00eb se Ramabaja apo kompania kan\u00eb ofruar sh\u00ebrbime profesionale t\u00eb auditimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, duke marr\u00eb parasysh se Ramabaja \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtor dhe person i autorizuar i OE \u201cH&amp;N SH.P.K.\u201d, mund t\u00eb konkludohet se referenca \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar nga ai vet\u00eb p\u00ebr veten e tij, gj\u00eb q\u00eb bie n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me objektivin e p\u00ebrcaktuar nga Autoriteti Kontraktues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 3<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Izahir Kuka, inxhinier i nd\u00ebrtimtaris\u00eb me drejtim n\u00eb hidros, nuk ka ofruar referenca t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebshmuar p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn trevje\u00e7are t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e hidros, sipas dosjes s\u00eb tenderit. Referencat e ofruara nga Grupi i Operator\u00ebve Ekonomik\u00eb (GOE) p\u00ebr Kuka mbulojn\u00eb vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb prej 2 vitesh, 6 muajsh dhe 21 dit\u00ebsh (nga data 20.04.2022 deri m\u00eb 10.11.2024), duke mos p\u00ebrmbushur kriterin e p\u00ebrcaktuar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nj\u00eb nga referencat mban dat\u00ebn 10.11.2024, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb pas afatit t\u00eb fundit p\u00ebr dor\u00ebzimin e tender\u00ebve (30.10.2024). Po ashtu, referencat e l\u00ebshuara nga kompanit\u00eb \u201cInvestPro\u201d dhe \u201cNikaPro\u201d nuk p\u00ebrputhen me CV-n\u00eb e dor\u00ebzuar nga Kuka.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sipas formularit t\u00eb deklarimit t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb p\u00ebr vitet 2023 dhe 2024 pran\u00eb Agjencis\u00eb Kund\u00ebr Korrupsionit, Kuka ka deklaruar se \u00ebsht\u00eb \u201cZyrtar i Lart\u00eb i Prokurimit\u201d n\u00eb Komun\u00ebn e Ka\u00e7anikut q\u00eb nga 01.06.2004. N\u00eb deklarim ai ka sh\u00ebnuar se nuk ka t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb tjera personale, gj\u00eb q\u00eb ngre dyshime mbi sakt\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e referencave t\u00eb dor\u00ebzuara p\u00ebr t\u00eb. (<a href=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Izahir-Kuka-deklarimi-pasurise.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>DOKUMENT<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">M\u00eb tej, z. Kuka ka n\u00ebnshkruar kontrata n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e menaxherit t\u00eb prokurimit n\u00eb Komun\u00ebn e Ka\u00e7anikut me OE \u201cNIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K.\u201d, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ka firmosur edhe nj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re si pjes\u00eb e GOE p\u00ebr realizimin e tenderit p\u00ebr \u201cRivler\u00ebsimin e Aseteve n\u00eb NH \u2018Iber Lepenc\u2019.\u201d Kjo situat\u00eb krijon konflikt t\u00eb interesit dhe ngre shqet\u00ebsime serioze p\u00ebr p\u00ebrputhshm\u00ebrin\u00eb me rregulloret e prokurimit publik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/kontrata-zyratri-porkurimit.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-848992\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 4<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ardian Morina \u2013 Teknologjia Informative: Referencat e prezantuara nuk mbulojn\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e k\u00ebrkuar n\u00eb dosjen e tenderit p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb prej tre viteve. Data e l\u00ebshimit t\u00eb referencave nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb harmoni me periudh\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ato jan\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">P\u00ebr shembull, kompania AFA-Ing ka l\u00ebshuar nj\u00eb referenc\u00eb m\u00eb dat\u00eb 02.03.2018, nd\u00ebrsa periudha e deklaruar p\u00ebr referenc\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb 29.06.2015 \u2013 26.03.2018. Kjo tregon se data e l\u00ebshimit t\u00eb referenc\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb para p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb mbuluar nga referenca. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, periudha e mbuluar nga kjo referenc\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb 2 vite, 8 muaj dhe 26 dit\u00eb, dhe jo tre vite si\u00e7 k\u00ebrkohej n\u00eb dosjen e tenderit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjithashtu, referenca e l\u00ebshuar nga kompania X Sh.P.K. p\u00ebrmban dat\u00ebn 20.03.2016, por mbulon periudh\u00ebn 2014\u20132018. Edhe kjo referenc\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar p\u00ebrpara dat\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb angazhimit. Referencat duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb d\u00ebshmi q\u00eb v\u00ebrtetojn\u00eb se angazhimi \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfunduar me sukses, por n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast l\u00ebshimi i referencave p\u00ebrpara p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb periudh\u00ebs ngre dyshime mbi seriozitetin dhe sakt\u00ebsin\u00eb e tyre.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 5<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Qemail Qehaja \u2013 Inxhinier i diplomuar i Makineris\u00eb: Referencat e dor\u00ebzuara nga Qehaja n\u00eb ofert\u00ebn e Grupit t\u00eb Operator\u00ebve Ekonomik\u00eb (GOE) nuk p\u00ebrputhen me CV-n\u00eb e prezantuar dhe t\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar nga vet\u00eb ai.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">P\u00ebr shembull, \u00ebsht\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar nj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb e n\u00ebnshkruar nga Qehaja me OE \u201cNIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K.\u201d m\u00eb dat\u00eb 26.02.2024, nd\u00ebrsa referenca e tij p\u00ebr angazhime n\u00eb projekte p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn 2017\u20132022 \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar n\u00eb vitin 2023. Kjo referenc\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e mb\u00ebshtetur n\u00eb kontrata t\u00eb plota dhe angazhimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar referenca nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i dokumentuar n\u00eb CV-n\u00eb e tij.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 6<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Procesi i vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb ofertave p\u00ebr aktivitetin e prokurimit \u201cRivler\u00ebsimi i Aseteve n\u00eb Nd\u00ebrmarrjen Publike NH \u2018Iber Lepenc\u2019 Sh.A.\u201d nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer si\u00e7 duhet. Kjo d\u00ebshmohet edhe nga raporti i vler\u00ebsimit, ku thuhet se vlefshm\u00ebria e ofert\u00ebs s\u00eb GOE \u201cPro Ace Group SH.P.K.; H &amp; N SH.P.K.; NIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K.\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb 60-ditore, nd\u00ebrsa dosja e tenderit k\u00ebrkonte nj\u00eb vlefshm\u00ebri prej 90 dit\u00ebsh. (<a href=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Ankesa-1154-24-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Ankesa m\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha dokumentet<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 7<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">N\u00eb ofert\u00ebn e GOE \u201cPro Ace Group SH.P.K.; H &amp; N SH.P.K.; NIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K.\u201d jan\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar dy polisa t\u00eb sigurimit t\u00eb tenderit me data dhe p\u00ebrmbajtje t\u00eb ndryshme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Polisa e par\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar m\u00eb 28.10.2024 me numrin e polis\u00eb 060010330097844, nd\u00ebrsa e dyta \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebshuar m\u00eb 30.10.2024 me numrin 060010330097780.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Polisa e par\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar s\u00eb bashku me ofert\u00ebn, nd\u00ebrsa e dyta \u00ebsht\u00eb ngarkuar n\u00eb platform\u00ebn e-prokurimit para publikimit t\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebr dh\u00ebnien e kontrat\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr dallim midis dy polisave \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebrja e GOE: N\u00eb polisan e par\u00eb jan\u00eb p\u00ebrmendur vet\u00ebm \u201cPro Ace Group SH.P.K.\u201d dhe \u201cH &amp; N SH.P.K.,\u201d nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb t\u00eb dyt\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb shtuar edhe \u201cNIKA Pro-Ing SH.P.K.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Pika ankimore 8<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Behar Januzi, ekspert gjyq\u00ebsor p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e pronave t\u00eb paluajtshme, sipas Aktvendimit nr. CN.ru.298\/20 t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 02.08.2022 nga Gjykata Themelore n\u00eb Ferizaj, \u00ebsht\u00eb kritikuar p\u00ebr munges\u00eb profesionalizmi. N\u00eb aktvendim \u00ebsht\u00eb refuzuar propozimi p\u00ebr shpron\u00ebsim n\u00eb shum\u00ebn totale prej 524,624.00 euro, e cila bazohej n\u00eb mendimin e ekspertit Januzi. Ky vendim tregon se Januzi nuk ka nj\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb profesional gjat\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb profesionit t\u00eb tij si vler\u00ebsues i pronave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pra, bazuar n\u00eb dokumentin q\u00eb e ka par\u00eb Demorkacia.com, Januzi ka dashur t\u00eb d\u00ebmtoj\u00eb shtetin p\u00ebr 536000 euro, por nuk ja ka dal (<a href=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Gjykata.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>DOKUMENT<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebto \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb ngritura, procesi i vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb ofertave p\u00ebr aktivitetin e prokurimit \u201cRivler\u00ebsimi i Aseteve n\u00eb Nd\u00ebrmarrjen Publike NH \u2018Iber Lepenc\u2019 Sh.A.\u201d nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kriteret e p\u00ebrzgjedhjes t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuara n\u00eb dosjen e tenderit dhe ka shkelur disa nene t\u00eb Ligjit p\u00ebr Prokurimin Publik (LPP).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Por t\u00eb rikthehemi krejt n\u00eb fillim edhe nj\u00eb her\u00eb. \u201cIb\u00ebr Lepenci\u201d&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/e-prokurimi.rks-gov.net\/SPIN_PROD\/APPLICATION\/IPN\/DocumentManagement\/DokumentPodaciFrm.aspx?id=3287913\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">kishte hapur ofert\u00ebn p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb tender m\u00eb 23 gusht 2023.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kompania q\u00eb tani \u00ebsht\u00eb rekomanduar p\u00ebr kontrat\u00eb,&nbsp;<strong>Pro ACC<\/strong>, kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr rishqyrtim te nd\u00ebrmarrja, duke pretenduar se ishin vendosur nj\u00eb varg kriteresh t\u00eb kund\u00ebrligjshme. Nd\u00ebrmarrja qendrore i kishte hedhur posht\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha pretendimet.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/ankes-pro-acc.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Pas k\u00ebsaj, m\u00eb 13 shtator, kompania iu drejtua OSHP-s\u00eb<\/a>. Ky organ autorizoi ekspertin e vet shqyrtues p\u00ebr t\u00eb analizuar pretendimet,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/eskperti.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">dhe eksperti konstatoi shkelje, duke autorizuar bordin e vet q\u00eb t\u00eb detyronte \u201cIb\u00ebr Lepencin\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsonte ato kritere.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pak para se bordi t\u00eb merrte nj\u00eb vendim, kompania&nbsp;<strong>Pro ACC<\/strong>&nbsp;e t\u00ebrhoqi ankes\u00ebn, pasi nd\u00ebrmarrja u pajtua me gjetjet e ekspertit dhe b\u00ebri korrigjimin e disa prej kritereve. Por, a jan\u00eb korrigjuar ato kritere n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha pikat ashtu si\u00e7 pretendonte pala ankuese? Kjo mbetet e paqart\u00eb, pasi paneli miratoi marr\u00ebveshjen mes pal\u00ebve pa shqyrtuar pretendimet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/paneli.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Pajtimi i arritur mes pal\u00ebve nuk bie ndesh me parimet baz\u00eb dhe dispozitat e Ligjit p\u00ebr Prokurimin Publik t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs dhe nuk e cenon pavar\u00ebsin\u00eb institucionale t\u00eb AK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjidhur \u00e7\u00ebshtjen kontestuese, meq\u00eb natyra e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes e lejon k\u00ebt\u00eb n\u00eb rastin konkret, mes t\u00eb tjerash, konform nenit 19, paragrafi 4 t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Pun\u00ebs s\u00eb OSHP-s\u00eb Nr. 01\/2020 (e amandamentuar)<\/a>\u201d, &nbsp;ka konsideruar paneli.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Demorkacia.com<\/strong>&nbsp;m\u00eb dat\u00eb 27 n\u00ebntor i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar kompanis\u00eb publike&nbsp; \u201cIb\u00ebr Lepenc\u201d lidhur m\u00eb k\u00ebto pyetje: se \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar angazhimi i nj\u00eb eksperti gjyq\u00ebsor p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e pronave, kur licencimi i tyre b\u00ebhet nga Ministria p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse dhe jo nga KGJK? A \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo praktik\u00eb e zakonshme, duke pasur parasysh se shum\u00eb ekspert\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsor\u00eb nuk aplikojn\u00eb vullnetarisht p\u00ebr licencim?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPse keni vendosur p\u00ebr kompanin\u00eb&nbsp;<em>Pro ACC<\/em>&nbsp;edhe pse nuk i plot\u00ebson kriteret e k\u00ebrkuara nga tenderi?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">N\u00eb fund t\u00eb vendimit p\u00ebr refuzim, pse \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrmendur emri i operatorit&nbsp;<em>Pro ACC<\/em>&nbsp;si i refuzuar, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb m\u00eb pas \u00ebsht\u00eb shpallur fitues i tenderit?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A e keni pyetur Gjykat\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb verifikuar sa vler\u00ebsime ka kryer eksperti Behar Januzi p\u00ebr Gjykat\u00ebn, sa prej tyre jan\u00eb pranuar dhe sa jan\u00eb refuzuar?\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kjo nd\u00ebrmarrje q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebn autoritetin e Qeveris\u00eb s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs nuk ka kthyer p\u00ebrgjigje deri n\u00eb publikimin e k\u00ebtij artikulli.&nbsp;<strong>\/Demokracia.com\/<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/demokracia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/PYETJE.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-848994\"\/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nj\u00eb tender i shpallur nga Nd\u00ebrmarrja Publike Qendore \u201cIber Lepenc\u201d n\u00eb vler\u00eb prej 100 mij\u00eb euro p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin e aseteve publike ka hedhur dyshime t\u00eb forta mbi procedurat e ndjekura dhe ligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb ofertave. Ankesa e nj\u00eb grupi operator\u00ebsh ekonomik\u00eb t\u00eb eliminuar nga gara ka zbuluar nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb parregullsish q\u00eb prekin jo vet\u00ebm [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2273,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2274,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2272\/revisions\/2274"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rrjeti.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}